![]() It would also intrude on TikTok’s interest in disseminating its users’ videos-just as bookstores have a right to sell books written by others, and newspapers have a right to publish someone else’s opinion. If the government banned TikTok, it would undermine the free speech and association of millions of users. ![]() Many users create and enjoy entertainment like dance videos. Political candidates connect with voters. TikTok videos address topics “ as diverse as human thought.” Political satirists mock politicians. Many users choose TikTok over its competitors because of its unique content recommendation system to such users, social media platforms are not fungible. It has 100 million monthly users in the United States, and a billion worldwide. It is owned by ByteDance, a company headquartered in China. TikTok is a social media platform that hosts short videos. ![]() By reducing the massive stores of personal data collected by all businesses, TikTok included, we will reduce opportunities for all governments, China included, to buy or steal this data. Rather, we must enact comprehensive consumer data privacy legislation. ![]() Still, the best solution to these problems is not to single-out one business or country for a ban. TikTok raises special concerns, given the surveillance and censorship practices of its home country, China. Nearly all social media platforms and other online businesses collect a lot of personal data from their users. Before taking such a drastic step, the government must come forward with specific evidence showing, at the very least, a real problem and a narrowly tailored solution. So we are troubled by growing demands in the United States for restrictions on TikTok, a technology that many people have chosen to exchange information with others around the world. Politicians shouldn’t be able to tell you what to say, where to say it, or who to say it to. Puris expressed concerns that very few women had been named to permanent leadership roles during the North America reorganization the way TikTok handled the sexual harassment incident at Cannes Lion and the emphasis at TikTok on hiring ‘young, fresh talent,'” the suit adds.Freedom of speech and association include the right to choose one’s communication technologies. Puris emailed Jimenez and expressed concerns about the treatment of women at TikTok, age discrimination, the sexual harassment at Cannes Lion and the overall work environment,” the ex-Head of the Global Brand and Creative Organization at Tik Tok says she told Wendy Jimenez, Tik Tok’s Global Human Resources chief. Once the exec learned that she was on the Beijing-based Zhang’s “kill list,” that her immediate team were under pressure “to make negative comments about her,” lamented the long workday “996 culture, the ongoing “micromanagement,” the overall treatment of female staffer and a supposed drunk come-on by an ad exec, and more, Puris asserts she had enough. After numerous alleged putdowns and dismissive reactions to her by ByteDance boss Zhang, Puris was told to stay quiet about said incidents and not even speak in company meetings anymore. In a tick tock of a different nature, Puris’ suit details the circumstances and conditions of her three years at Tik Tok - and it certainly reads like Mad Menwithout any of the wit. READ THE SEX DISCRIMINATION & RETALIATION LAWSUIT AGAINST TIK TOK HERE Puris lacked the docility and meekness specifically required of female employees,” the jury seeking filing states. Puris-one of the most senior female executives in the United States-was invited to attend and participate in bi-weekly meetings with Lidong Zhang, the Chairman of ByteDance, she was subjected to disparate treatment and ultimately unlawfully terminated because Lidong Zhang and other corporate executives determined that Ms.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |